Editor’s Note: The following article was written by Spencer James Smith and is being republished here as part of Greg Wyatt’s ongoing archive and examination of vaccine safety, autism, and related health-freedom issues.
It seems that close to 100% of articles that showcase outbreaks are all in demographics that are recently vaccinated. They claim it came from an unvaccinated person but it’s always in demographics that are the most recently vaccinated. There are articles about daycare/nursery kids. There are all the articles from kindergarten to grade 12. We have articles from universities and colleges as well. These schools also have vaccine requirements.
What you don’t have are articles talking about outbreaks in populations older than typical college/university age. You sometimes hear articles about the elderly. Usually these are articles from senior homes where vaccines are offered and are pushed to degrees.
The demographic of adults between seniors and young adults in colleges is the one where you do not hear about outbreaks, even though this demographic is technically the most “unvaccinated”. The schedule is always increasing and this group has less vaccines than the younger demographics that have more vaccines and have been more recently vaccinated.
They also don’t have the opportunity to possibly get symptoms that mirror the disease that the vaccine is supposed to protect against after being vaccinated, because they weren’t recently vaccinated. Many of those who are diagnosed with a disease in the event of an “outbreak” were actually vaccinated.
Let’s say that vaccines really did eradicate measles. Why has the CDC vaccine schedule increased significantly since 1995 to the present? Is there data to support that increased vaccine doses since 1995 have resulted in less people contracting the diseases?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646939
———–
“Results
From 1 May 1995 through 30 April 2005, ∼55.7 million doses of Varivax were distributed worldwide. Merck received 16,683 AE reports after the administration of varicella vaccine, for an overall reporting rate of 3.4 AEs/10,000 doses distributed (database query, 8 August 2005). AEs of interest that will be reviewed here include rash within 42 days of vaccination, breakthrough varicella, HZ, neurologic AEs, and secondary transmission of Oka VZV. The PCR results for the AEs of interest are presented in table 1.”
“Rashes within 42 days of vaccination. There were 3192 reports describing rashes occurring within 42 days after vaccination. Fifty-one percent were varicella-like rashes, 41% were not well described or were nonspecific rashes, and ∼8% were injection site rashes/vesicles. Sixty-five percent of the reported rashes occurred within the first 14 days of receiving the vaccine, and 89% occurred within the first 21 days.
The wild-type VZV rashes occurred a median of 8 days (range, 1–20 days) after vaccination, whereas the Oka VZV rashes occurred at a median of 21 days (range, 5–42 days) after vaccination. The median number of lesions with wild-type VZV rashes was 100 (range, 10–1000), whereas the median number of lesions with Oka VZV rashes was 51 (range, 1–500). Thirty six Thirty six (84%) of the 43 VZV rashes that occurred within the first 2 weeks after vaccination were identified as wild-type VZV, and 30 (83%) of 36 VZV rashes that occurred within 3–6 weeks were identified as the Oka VZV strain (figure 1).”
——-
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/2/e438?
“Although rotavirus vaccines are known to be shed in stools, transmission of vaccine-derived virus to unvaccinated contacts resulting in symptomatic rotavirus gastroenteritis has not been reported to our knowledge. We document here the occurrence of vaccine-derived rotavirus (RotaTeq [Merck and Co, Whitehouse Station, NJ]) transmission from a vaccinated infant to an older, unvaccinated sibling, resulting in symptomatic rotavirus gastroenteritis that required emergency department care.”
——–
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC228449/pdf/332485.pdf
“Because of the sporadic nature of outbreaks in populations with high rates of vaccination, …”
“RT-PCR assay was evaluated by using specimens obtained from recently vaccinated individuals.”
“Overall, measles virus RNA was detected in 56 (39%) of 144 samples.”
——-
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/58/9/1205/2895266/Outbreak-of-Measles-Among-Persons-With-Prior
“A measles outbreak occurred in New York City. All cases had prior evidence of measles immunity. Symptoms were consistent with measles. Laboratory results indicated secondary immune responses. This report documents measles transmission from an individual with verified secondary vaccine failure.”
“Results…The index patient had 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine; of 88 contacts, 4 secondary patients were confirmed who had either 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All patients had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high-avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response. Neutralizing antibody titers of secondary patients reached >80 000 mIU/mL 3–4 days after rash onset and that of the index was <500 mIU/mL 9 days after rash onset. No additional cases of measles occurred among 231 contacts of secondary patients.”
—-
“Outbreaks of influenza and other common illnesses occur every year aboard Navy vessels, but this situation was a bit different as US troops are vaccinated against the mumps.”
Mumps outbreak among highly vaccinated group:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24035994
All vaccinated on the ship, all tested positive:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-57830617
According to Dr. Russell Blaylock, a very experienced neurosurgeon, the vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth, which can be proven quite simply. ‘When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over seventy years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness two to ten years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.
If we listen to present day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgence massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least thirty to forty years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity hasn’t existed in this county for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.”
Dr. Tetyana, immunologist PhD can in these two clips. She uses stats, charts and studies that prove there is no such thing as herd immunity resulting from vaccines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6dZ5SDAxqM
The pamphlet above proves that there is no such thing as vaccine-induced herd-immunity. If 6% of adults in Canada have the current vaccine schedule, then where are all the outbreaks of the MMR and DTaP in the adult population? Why is it that the least vaccinated demographic in Canada has the least cases of what the vaccines are supposed to protect against, of which said vaccines, they are deficient in? Or, if Health Canada is wrong with their stats, why are they so off? Is there an agenda to market vaccines to younger demographics?
Media/government tells you that a single person vaccinated isn’t enough and that since vaccines aren’t perfect, it still might not work. Therefore they need a certain high percentage of people vaccinated to ensure it works. But if vaccinated individuals are afraid of unvaccinated individuals due to the possible ineffectiveness of the vaccine, then how are vaccines somehow effective enough to actually immunize enough people to achieve herd immunity in the first place?
One vaccine won’t work, but millions of them will? Either a vaccine works or it doesn’t. A vaccine is supposed to give immunity. No herd immunity should be required. The obsession with vaccination rates and herd immunity rates simply prove vaccines do not work.
